Going to watch hearings from the auxiliary courtroom today and give that a shot. That should allow for more live tweeting than usual. So if you haven't yet, follow me @KDHcrime. I will hashtag everything with #Hasan.
So today, we should get a more detailed glimpse into the "defense of others" accused Fort Hood shooter Maj. Nidal Hasan plans to put on during trial. Hasan has been asked to provide further information about his defense strategy to weigh whether he should be given a delay to the start date of his death penalty court-martial.
Hasan's macabre defense is that he admittedly killed U.S. Army soldiers in order to defend Taliban fighters in Afghanistan, their leadership and specifically their spiritual leader Mullah Mohammed Omar. The defense, in this reporter's opinion, is ironic. As Killeen resident Michael Homiller put it in this letter to the editor, his defense "fits the literal constitutional definition of treason."
Here is my write up for today's hearing.
Reuter's write up via the Chicago Tribune is mainly summary, though Texas Tech law professor Richard Rosen, a retired colonel who was assigned to Fort Hood's JAG, says Hasan's defense of others is "like an American soldier shooting fellow GIs during World War Two, and then asserting that he was only trying to protect the Nazi leadership."
Most other media outlets used the standard Associated Press write-up.
AP sketch artist is here along with reporters from the Wall Street Journal, New York Times, Austin American-Statesman and local television outlets.
Contact Philip Jankowski at firstname.lastname@example.org or (254) 501-7553