• September 19, 2014

Minding the Ps and Qs of antler restrictions

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Thursday, December 5, 2013 11:26 pm

Texas deer hunters should be aware that in 2-buck counties, including Bell, Coryell, Hamilton, and others, “special antler restrictions” are included in state hunting laws, according to regulations specified by Texas Parks and Wildlife.

Spike bucks, or those with “at least one unbranched antler,” remain legal to take in these counties, but all other legal bucks must have “an inside spread measurement between main beams of 13 inches or greater.”

The rule of thumb in Texas Parks and Wildlife’s Outdoor Annual outlines that the outer tips of the ears are “approximately 13 inches apart and may be used to judge the inside spread.”

According to the Outdoor Annual’s illustration, the outer tips of the buck’s ears, in the alert position, must line up with the tip of the outer-most or middle point of his antlers’ main beam. This point also lines up with the lower area of the main beam from which all the outer antler points branch out. In other words, in order for a buck with more than one branched antler to be legally taken, the outer-most part of his antlers must extend out past his ears.

These relatively new regulations have been a part of state deer hunting laws for several years now and, in spite of their good long-term intentions, have stirred up some controversy among hunters.

The stated and fairly obvious intention of lawmakers, with these regulations, is to protect a segment of the younger buck population from over-hunting, allowing for an eventually greater number of fully matured bucks, animals that have been lacking in numbers in certain counties in recent years under former regulations.

The controversy comes with hunters’ questions such as, “Why are the youngest bucks (spikes) legal, while slightly older bucks (most 4-pointers, 6-pointers, and small or average 8-pointers) are now illegal to take?”

I’ve found myself in comical discussions among area deer hunters where the scenario is introduced that a buck is not going to wait for you to exit your deer stand, then kindly wait for you to reach him and gauge his antler spread with a tape measure to ensure he’s legal to shoot. Most hunters I’ve talked with simply see this as an extra and unwelcome challenge to an already challenged practice.

Another consideration is , aside from a spike, a deer now legal to harvest would be considered the trophy of a lifetime for some areas of the regulations’ affected counties.

This is definitely an issue that has produced varied opinions.

It should also be noted that current law also states an antler point is only considered a legal point if it is at least 1 inch in length. So, that old rule of thumb that says, “If you can hang a ring on it, it’s a point,” is no longer such a relevant rule. That is, unless you happen to have really large fingers!  

What do you think?

More about

More about

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
  • 2 Don't Threaten or Abuse. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated. AND PLEASE TURN OFF CAPS LOCK.
  • 3 Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
  • 4 Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 5 Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 6 Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.

Welcome to the discussion.

6 comments:

  • Shawn Paul posted at 10:10 pm on Thu, Dec 19, 2013.

    Shawn Paul Posts: 34

    Thanks for your comment, awilson. Most any new proposition comes with a list of cons, and in this case, you are not alone in your aggravation. We can only hope that most hunters will see positive results, and I believe, under the right conditions, it is very possible, if not likely.

     
  • awilson posted at 9:50 pm on Sun, Dec 15, 2013.

    awilson Posts: 9

    Its a good but aggravating law. We don't see many bucks that qualify under the law here. Maybe some day it will happen.

     
  • Shawn Paul posted at 9:59 pm on Wed, Dec 11, 2013.

    Shawn Paul Posts: 34

    Thanks for lending your take on this topic, Dub. You definitely make a good point that seems to deserve consideration by all concerned.

     
  • Shawn Paul posted at 9:57 pm on Wed, Dec 11, 2013.

    Shawn Paul Posts: 34

    Thanks for weighing in on this, Hill51. That is the intention of the regulation, so it will be a positive thing if it succeeds to produce more and more mature bucks. I am curious though, as to whether this regulation will come and go, or if it will remain permanently. It must be proving successful thus far, because the antler restrictions have been in place for a few years now.

     
  • Hill51 posted at 11:46 am on Wed, Dec 11, 2013.

    Hill51 Posts: 6

    It's sometimes hard to tell if you should shoot but I must admit I see a larger number of large antlers.

     
  • Dub posted at 11:28 am on Wed, Dec 11, 2013.

    Dub Posts: 4

    Great article! These laws are keeping older hunters, who don't see as well as they used to, and have contributed greatly to wildlife management, from hunting.