• November 27, 2014

Hasan says he was defending Taliban

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Wednesday, June 5, 2013 4:30 am | Updated: 2:13 pm, Thu Jan 23, 2014.

FORT HOOD — Accused Fort Hood shooter Maj. Nidal Hasan told a military court Tuesday he was defending the Taliban during the 2009 mass shooting on post.

Hasan’s comments, offered in soft tones when questioned by the judge, marked the first time the Army psychiatrist made any indication as to a motive in the shooting that left 13 dead.

Presiding judge Col. Tara Osborn had been questioning Hasan about his new defense strategy, which he announced in court Monday after Osborn granted his request to represent himself at trial.

Hasan said he was defending “the leadership of the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan, the Taliban.”

He also named Mullah Mohammed Omar, the spiritual leader of the Taliban, believed to be alive somewhere in Pakistan, according to Jeffrey Addicott, director of the Center for Terrorism Law at St. Mary’s University.

“What Osama bin Laden was to al-Qaida, he (Omar) is to the Taliban,” Addicott said.

Hasan’s admission follows a narrative that has consistently painted him as a “home-grown terrorist” and a Muslim extremist.

A congressional report showed that Hasan exchanged emails with  Anwar al’Awlaki, the U.S.-born cleric with ties to al-Qaida slain in a 2011 drone attack. Hasan also made statements to the news network Al Jazeera indicating an identification with the mujahedeen.

Tuesday’s statements confirmed what Addicott had long thought.

“Hasan has declared himself an enemy combatant in league with the Taliban,” he said.

Hasan requested a three-month delay in the trial to prepare his defense, but Osborn made no ruling Tuesday. She did allow Hasan an additional day to prepare remarks to explain his strategy. The hearing will resume today at the Fort Hood courthouse, and jury selection was delayed until at least Monday.

Hasan, 42, appeared hesitant to talk in depth about his defense strategy. Though none of his comments will be available to the jury prior to trial, he told Osborn he wanted to gather his thoughts and asked to submit them in writing.

He is charged with the shooting deaths of 13 people on post on Nov. 5, 2009, and could be put to death if convicted.

After a brief recess, Osborn asked if the leaders of the Taliban were the people Hasan was defending when he used “deadly force.” Hasan replied, “Yes.”

“They were in the U.S. Army,” he said. “They were in an SRP (soldier readiness processing) site about to deploy to Afghanistan.”

Hasan also was set to deploy to Afghanistan when the shooting occurred.

Hasan’s trial would not be the first time an alleged Muslim extremist represented himself in a death penalty trial.

Zacarias Moussaoui, the “20th hijacker” tied to the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, represented himself in a trial that was permeated with extremist speeches and court filings that called high-ranking U.S. officials “soldiers of Satan.”

Moussaoui at first exercised his right to represent himself during his federal trial in Virginia. It was later revoked after he repeatedly disrupted hearings, Moussaoui’s lawyer Edward B. MacMahon said.

MacMahon said similar things would happen in Hasan’s trial if he attempts to hijack hearings with political speech.

“This guy is probably certain he is going to get convicted, so he’s looking to get as much press as he can on the way out,” MacMahon said. “He still has to behave as anyone else would. The minute he does something that the judge thinks was improper, she’ll revoke his pro se status.”

The lead attorney in the lawsuit between victims of the Fort Hood shooting and the Department of Defense said he was “outraged” by Hasan’s statement.

Neal Sher is representing more than 100 victims and their family members in an attempt to reclassify the attack from workplace violence to a terrorist act.

Many of Sher’s clients claim they were denied essential medical care and benefits due to the government’s refusal to label the shooting as a combat-related incident.

“Hasan has acknowledged what everybody but our government has understood — namely that he was a jihadist and that he committed this heinous act of terror, fulfilling his jihadist views,” Sher said.

More about

More about

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
  • 2 Don't Threaten or Abuse. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated. AND PLEASE TURN OFF CAPS LOCK.
  • 3 Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
  • 4 Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 5 Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 6 Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.

Welcome to the discussion.

11 comments:

  • Retireed Msgt posted at 8:23 pm on Thu, Jun 13, 2013.

    Retireed Msgt Posts: 1

    He apparently has not denied the charges, but his "defense of others" is nothing less than an admission of guilt. Basically, he is saying, "I did it, but I should be forgiven because I did it in the defense of others." How many Taliban were under attack in that room on 9 November 2009? Oh.. none? Using Hasan's reasoning, we should now kill ALL Muslims, wherever we find them, because the Taliban are Muslims, and the Taliban kill Americans. How monumentally STUPID is that line of reasoning? Yet the Army is entertaining Hasan's request. Proof positive that, "A person who represents himself has a fool for a client." Hasan needs to be tired and fried!

     
  • Mandy G posted at 3:19 pm on Wed, Jun 5, 2013.

    Mandy G Posts: 2

    Also add "traitor" to the list. Of course, I haven't seen that word used in a long time, but I think it describes him, along with other words that I won't use in polite company.

     
  • Mandy G posted at 3:17 pm on Wed, Jun 5, 2013.

    Mandy G Posts: 2

    So has this latest information reached the White House? Now will they reclassify this as an act of terrorism instead of "workplace violence" so the victims can receive benefits they should have gotten all along? All of this makes me ill.

     
  • KtownBeliever posted at 9:05 am on Wed, Jun 5, 2013.

    KtownBeliever Posts: 3

    I love my country and believe that it's the best country in the world. But the way this terrorist's trial has been handled sickens me. And how about giving that O-4 salary this terrorist is still making to the victims' families? I pray that this mockery of military justice ends soon with nothing less than a firing squad for this cowardly moron.

     
  • Mamma Griz posted at 8:50 am on Wed, Jun 5, 2013.

    Mamma Griz Posts: 257

    I thought that in order to be protecting somneone or something you had to be right there. Let's get this show on the road and get it over with. Deny this terrorist any and all requests for delay. He's had enough time to prepare for this show. The judge give him another delay will just show that military justice has gone down the toilet. Oh, for military standards to be as they were fifty years ago! [angry]

     
  • Proud Mother of an Army Avi8er posted at 7:06 am on Wed, Jun 5, 2013.

    Proud Mother of an Army Avi8er Posts: 239

    Is this still being called...Workplace violence?

    "Nidal Hasan told a military court Tuesday he was defending the Taliban during the 2009 mass shooting on post."
    “Hasan has declared himself an enemy combatant in league with the Taliban."

    After Hasan's comments on Tuesday...how can this be anything but Terrorism!
    He is a TERRORIST...off with his head.

     
  • dionneglenn posted at 1:31 pm on Tue, Jun 4, 2013.

    dionneglenn Posts: 2

     
  • dionneglenn posted at 1:28 pm on Tue, Jun 4, 2013.

    dionneglenn Posts: 2

    Premeditated murder should be added to all the counts if it hasn't been included already. It is apparent that his intent in joining the US Army was to ultimately kill American citizens in defense of an enemies of this country.

     
  • mgardner posted at 12:54 pm on Tue, Jun 4, 2013.

    mgardner Posts: 2

    How long must we wait for justice? I sat in the auditorium next to the killing in terror for my life. Wounded solider was brought inside shouting " He's shooting soldiers man". Now he gets to say he was protecting someone? He is a terrorist and should be treated as such. What make me mad is he is still being paid his salary!!!!!. Enough is enough!!!

     
  • SuzyW posted at 12:21 pm on Tue, Jun 4, 2013.

    SuzyW Posts: 1

    he is in the U.S. Army as well so he should have killed himself first to protect others. Stupid defense.

     
  • stnyn posted at 12:01 pm on Tue, Jun 4, 2013.

    stnyn Posts: 4

    what makes me mad is that terrorist is getting top sercuirty for his court hearing. they should give compensation to the victums now since he amited that he did a terroist act. I hope the judge denies him his stall request.

     

Ft Hood Events