• January 19, 2017

Judge allows Hasan to represent himself

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
  • 2 Don't Threaten or Abuse. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated. AND PLEASE TURN OFF CAPS LOCK.
  • 3 Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
  • 4 Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 5 Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 6 Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.

Welcome to the discussion.


  • Mamma Griz posted at 2:17 pm on Sun, Jun 9, 2013.

    Mamma Griz Posts: 302

    A man who represents himself in court has a fool for a client. On the other hand, the fool of a client has a fool for a lawyer. [censored]

  • Smithjr38 posted at 2:17 pm on Tue, Jun 4, 2013.

    Smithjr38 Posts: 114

    Obamas hero Nidal Hasan said Monday that he will pursue a “defense of others” argument in a tactic that will likely frame the Nov. 5, 2009, mass shooting on post as an act to prevent violence against Muslims
    I hope the prosecutor is not a Obama /Holder rear licker . So the Prosecutor can point out to the jury that the Major took a oath to defend the USA from both foreign and domestic enemies and Afghanistan is not part of the USA, but has been a enemy of the USA since 9/11 .
    And that was fellow Americans he murdered for his occult of murder Muslim religion .

  • Eliza posted at 6:29 am on Tue, Jun 4, 2013.

    Eliza Posts: 1093

    @ Hasan requested a three-month delay to the start of his court-martial to prepare his defense. He had previously told the presiding judge, Col. Tara Osborn, no delay would be necessary if she granted his request to represent himself.

    Hasan asked for time to prepare the defense and create a new witness list.
    His defense will revolve around a portion of law similar to self-defense, but instead involves the protection of a third party from imminent harm.

    The above 1st paragraph lets me know the Major is a liar and can't be trusted to tell any of the real truth as he presents 'his case'.

    The second paragraph stating his defense will be he was involved in the protection of 'a third party' .
    Who would this be ? His Muslim Brothers in the middle east ?
    That allows anyone reading that line of defense ,Know the Major does indeed have a fool for a client.
    He's going to state inside an American Court Room ,that he was concerned for the welfare of what is an enemy force to our own military forces ? So he killed those he considered a threat . Plus added on some extra in the form of civilians?

    If this Major is ridiculous enough to state this was his concern, and his defense,
    and his reasoning for killing. The court should immediately add the Charge of Treason against the Major .
    And then confiscate any funds he has accumulated off of the American Tax payer, while being paid as a sworn member of the U.S. Armed Forces, as money falsely received.