• December 20, 2014

Court lockout irks Grisham supporters

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Saturday, October 19, 2013 4:30 am

As the jury remained deadlocked in the trial of Army Master Sgt. Christopher “C.J.” Grisham, rumors and speculation circulated throughout the courthouse as to how many jurors were holding out and what their backgrounds could be.

For Grisham’s supporters, many of whom attended the trial all week, the lack of reliable information Friday was almost as irritating as being locked out of the courtroom.

“After 14 hours of waiting while the jury deliberates, it feels extremely frustrating to see the jury come in and out and to be excluded from the proceedings,” said James Everard, a Grisham supporter.

Judge Neel Richardson closed the courtroom when deliberations began Wednesday afternoon, barring the public and media from observing the proceedings.

Lloyd Brown, a spokesman for the Texas State Bar Association, said Richardson was within his legal rights to close the courtroom.

“Judicial proceedings aren’t covered by the Open Meetings Act,” Brown said. “It is up to the judge’s discretion to allow the media or the public to enter.”

County Attorney Jim Nichols said courtroom procedure is determined by each individual judge and Richardson may have had some concerns about the jury’s ability to hear the gallery, or vice versa.

“The courtroom and the jury room share a common wall,” Nichols said, adding that the decision to lock out the public and the media wasn’t something his office requested.

Blue Rannefeld, Grisham’s defense attorney, said the decision to bar the public and the media from the courtroom during deliberations and the jury’s receipt of supplemental instructions was made unilaterally by Richardson.

Rannefeld also said that because access to a courtroom is at the judge’s discretion, he didn’t feel that it rose to the level of judicial misconduct, but comments Richardson made in both open court and in chambers during the trial did.

“I believe that his comments made it more difficult for the jury to reach a verdict,” Rannefeld said. “I will make sure that this judge will not be on the next trial.”

More about

More about

More about

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
  • 2 Don't Threaten or Abuse. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated. AND PLEASE TURN OFF CAPS LOCK.
  • 3 Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
  • 4 Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 5 Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 6 Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.

Welcome to the discussion.

1 comment:

  • 45K 3H posted at 10:55 am on Fri, Oct 25, 2013.

    45K 3H Posts: 1

    This is sad for a (Master Sargent) to act out the way he did with the police. I have worn the uniform and was informed that when every law enforce ask for (ID) you show it. This Master Sargent knew thyat but refused to do so and now he wants (Bell County) too let him do what he want, no way . He needs too be held accountable for his actions. The (Uniform) can not give him the right too do what he want at no time. He is not in the war zone were he might get away with that kind of behavior. Is this the kind of (Leadership) we have on Ft. Hood? If so lord help us all.