State board of education member Thomas Ratliff listens to testimony during a public hearing on proposed new science textbooks Sept. 17, 2013, in Austin.

Eric Gay | AP

Wanda Jenkins doesn’t want political agendas to affect what future U.S. leaders learn.

Jenkins, 81, said the public should have more input on which textbooks are used to teach more than 5 million students across the state.

“It shouldn’t be, ‘This person has a nice title, we’ll get them to look at it,’” said Jenkins, who has two great-grandchildren attending public school in Harker Heights.

Instead, Jenkins believes parents should get involved.

“Not everyone has to be a Christian, but not everyone has to be spoon-fed (about evolution) either,” she said. “It should be up to the parent or the children. ... (Education) is not a pill that you open wide and swallow; it’s supposed to tickle the brain of the child, make them interested and make them learn more.”

Jenkins plans to contact her local representatives to discuss the Texas Board of Education’s recent approval of tighter rules on the volunteer-based citizen panels that review proposed textbooks.

Although the 15-member board approves textbooks for school districts to use, objections raised by reviewers can influence its decision.

Friday’s unanimous vote mandates teachers or professors be given priority to serve on the textbook review panels for subjects in their areas of expertise.

The new rule also enables the board to appoint outside experts to check objections raised by review panels and ensure they are based on fact, not ideology.

It also requires proposed books be reviewed by at least two panel members, so a single volunteer can’t raise objections, and restricts board members’ contact with reviewers to avoid unfair influence.

“I’m a little reluctant to weigh in on what’s happening at the state level,” said Robert Muller, Killeen Independent School District superintendent.

Instead, Muller focuses on his district’s approach in determining which books will be used in classrooms.

Diana Miller, assistant superintendent for Killeen ISD, said a committee — largely comprised of Killeen ISD teachers across different grade levels and subjects — meets with publishers to review potential textbooks for the school to adopt.

The Killeen ISD started meeting with publishers a few weeks ago to review which math textbooks it will adopt for kindergarten through eighth-grade students and which science textbooks it will use to teach kindergarten through 12th-graders next school year.

The committee will take their recommendation to the Killeen ISD board of trustees later this year.

“We review them for appropriateness and content,” Muller said. “We want to make sure we receive broad-based input on any recommendation taken to the board. We feel pretty good about the process we’ve established.”

At the state level, Texas education board member David Bradley said he did his best to insert language mitigating what was approved. But, he said, “Liberals are really trying to make it difficult for Christians and conservatives to have a voice in public education.”

Meanwhile, Texas education board member Thomas Ratliff said, “it won’t eliminate politics, but it will make it where it’s a more informed process.”

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Contact Sarah Rafique at or (254) 501-7549. Follow her on Twitter at SarahRafique or "like" Sarah Rafique.

I'm the education reporter at the Killeen Daily Herald. Follow me on Twitter at

(1) comment


I'm with Wanda. I do not want our future leaders exposed to a political agenda either. And I certainly don't want our children exposed to Sharia law either. Get all references to Sharia law completely removed from the educational standards/books/text reading materials that our children are reading today. Lets face it, when a school commits to removing language, such as a simple slogan ' Merica Monday', and the school rebukes it saying 'America Day Celebration deemed too offensive', it seems to me that we have our values reversed and in the wrong place. We can place a holiday such as 'Cinco De Mayo', but we cannot honor 'our country' for fear of it being 'too offensive'. Now it's 'politically incorrect' to voice homage to this country which gives them the very freedoms they are now wanting to do away with. I guess we are now teaching our future leaders to be a troll. Yes I'm with Wanda in not using the text books that our children use as avenues for serfdom. But I tend to disagree with the premise that only teachers and educators can define what is place in our text books. You know a great many of our educators 'tend' to slip over to the other side, Socialism, and that's not good for America. A lot can be said that when educating, if you don't agree with what the one who is educating is teaching, fire the teacher, but with tenure I guess that is impossible. Unions have seen to that.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.