• October 25, 2014

Jury rules Killeen officer used excessive force

Jury also found officer did not violate rights

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Friday, August 9, 2013 4:30 am

A Killeen police officer used excessive force in a March 2011 public intoxication arrest, a federal jury ruled Tuesday, but jurors said Officer Givon Emeana was not trying to violate the constitutional rights of Brian Tobias Stanley during the incident.

Stanley filed a civil complaint Nov. 16, seeking $75,000 for injuries in connection with his March 24, 2011, arrest.

Judge Walter S. Smith awarded Stanley nothing in the civil case Tuesday.

Jurors watched video of Stanley sitting in the back of a patrol car, Stanley’s attorney, Jason J. Bach, said. While Stanley’s right foot was lodged under a board beneath the front seat, Emeana allegedly yanked his left leg from the driver’s side. The force injured Stanley’s legs, tore his right MCL and sprained his right ACL.

Defense attorney Stuart Smith said Stanley kicked at Emeana, who responded by grabbing his leg.

“The video is from the outside of the car,” he said. “You can see the officer outside the vehicle and you can see him jerk back like someone’s kicking at him.”

Bach disputed the allegation. “When you look at the video, that doesn’t add up.”

While the jury declared the officer used excessive force, it also decided Emeana had an “objectively reasonable” belief that he was not violating Stanley’s rights.

“The jury verdict appears to be contradictory,” Bach said. “We don’t think it was possible for the jury to find he used excessive force and it was objectively reasonable.”

Representing the city of Killeen, Smith was happy with the outcome.

“We’re pleased to have prevailed,” he said. “(But) I don’t think (Emeana) used excessive force.”

Stanley sought monetary damages for pain, emotional distress, medical expenses, and loss of community, income and benefits, his court complaint stated.

Within 30 days, Bach said he plans to appeal the verdict or file a motion to set it aside.

More about

More about

More about

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
  • 2 Don't Threaten or Abuse. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated. AND PLEASE TURN OFF CAPS LOCK.
  • 3 Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
  • 4 Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 5 Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 6 Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.

Welcome to the discussion.

2 comments:

  • wilcfry posted at 1:23 pm on Sat, Aug 10, 2013.

    wilcfry Posts: 93

    It is just a little worrisome to think that excessive force by a police officer isn't considered an attempt to violate our constitutional rights.

    However, upon inspection of the Constitution and its various amendments, there isn't a specific right to not be subjected to excessive force by police. The closest we get is the Ninth Amendment, which says we have other rights not listed.

     
  • TDS posted at 2:13 pm on Fri, Aug 9, 2013.

    TDS Posts: 6

    I only got threatened when I was stopped in Killeen. Officer in my face talking trash for no reason. Stopping me for making a U-turn with ? feet of an incline.

    After I was disabled I was stopped the next time and lied on by the DPS officer. Real winners of public servants we have.....

     

Featured Events