• December 18, 2014

Local reactions mixed to High Court decision on DOMA policy

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Related Stories

Posted: Thursday, June 27, 2013 4:30 am

NOLANVILLE — Irene Andrews was gardening Wednesday morning when she heard a scream.

Andrews, a Nolanville resident, thought it might be an emergency, but it turned out to be her partner of 29 years reacting to the news. The Defense of Marriage Act, the federal legislation that allowed the federal government to not recognize same-sex marriages had been struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court.

“She said, ‘DOMA, DOMA’s gone down!’” Andrews said. “I ran into the house; we sat and watched the TV and jumped up and down.”

The court also struck a blow against conservatives by allowing gay marriages to resume in California. However, the impact of that case will likely remain isolated to the West Coast state.

The full impact of the Supreme Court’s 5-4 ruling has not been fully determined in states where same-sex marriage is not legal, including Texas.

The executive director of Equality Texas, a group that lobbies and advocates for lesbian and gay issues, said same-sex couples who are legally married in the 12 states that permit it may become immediately eligible for federal benefits, such as tax breaks.

The director, Chuck Smith, said a lot of gray area remains from one federal department to another.

“We would expect there would likely be some activity by the Obama administration either administratively or legislatively to clean that up and make that more standardized,” Smith said.

The immediate impact of the court’s decision on military same-sex couples at Fort Hood is unclear.

“We will execute orders and abide by the law,” Maj. Gen. Anthony Ierardi, Fort Hood’s senior post commander, said Wednesday when asked about the DOMA ruling. “We’ll do what the Army asks us to do and do what is right by soldiers and families.”

Andrews and her partner, Joan Hinshaw, already planned to travel to Washington state to be married July 20. Now they may be able to return to Texas with a certificate more valuable than a piece of paper.

State Rep. Jimmie Don Aycock, R-Killeen, disagreed with the rulings, calling them “unfortunate.”

“I think marriage should be one man and one woman,” Aycock said. “God has been clear about that forever.”

U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, said the court overreached in both rulings.

“Nothing in the Constitution compelled this result, and, once again, the court has chosen to substitute its own views of public policy for the democratically expressed will of the voters,” Cruz stated in a news release.

Rep. John Carter, R-Round Rock, refused to comment on the rulings.

The co-chair of a local political committee affiliated with Bell County Democrats that advocates for marriage equality said more work needs to be done.

“I hope, someday, to count Texas as one of the states that recognizes marriage equality either through the ballot box, legislative or through the courts,” stated Dion McFall. “I am extremely hopeful LGBT Texans will marry soon.”

More about

More about

More about

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
  • 2 Don't Threaten or Abuse. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated. AND PLEASE TURN OFF CAPS LOCK.
  • 3 Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
  • 4 Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 5 Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 6 Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.

Welcome to the discussion.

6 comments:

  • barbie500 posted at 8:02 pm on Thu, Jun 27, 2013.

    barbie500 Posts: 143

    I do think you should get the benefits and this is a good thing, but I still think marriage before God is between a man and a woman. Next thing you know people will want to marry thier pet since they support them. I just don't think it should be called a marriage, but for inheritance and benefits they should be able to get that.

     
  • nulisecundus posted at 6:48 pm on Thu, Jun 27, 2013.

    nulisecundus Posts: 134

    [sad][angry]how about procreation, going to be hard to do! and I do not believe in god or jesus, or the rest of the hocus pocus BS.

     
  • Dr Strangelove posted at 12:35 pm on Thu, Jun 27, 2013.

    Dr Strangelove Posts: 572

    What is the Devil’s biggest lie? “THERE IS NO GOD” this lady like most Obama supporters fell for the lie.

     
  • jefferygaspard posted at 11:27 am on Thu, Jun 27, 2013.

    jefferygaspard Posts: 2

    Evadently u don't believe in GOD sorry for u..

     
  • jefferygaspard posted at 11:25 am on Thu, Jun 27, 2013.

    jefferygaspard Posts: 2

    Lady why do u think Saudam and Gamora God struck down the city cause that was one thing that disgust him ,and God created man and a woman not 2 guys or 2 woman sorry but there is still a lot of people out here that do not support this abmonation ....

     
  • Mamma Griz posted at 7:24 am on Thu, Jun 27, 2013.

    Mamma Griz Posts: 259

    Did God himself say that marriage is between a man and a woman? That might be written in the Bible, but who wrote the Bible. MORTAL MAN, and God didn't come down from above and tell them just what to write-- and neither did Jesus. And how did MORTAL MAN know just what Jesus said? I don't believe tape recorders or batteries had been invented at that time, so nothing was recorded. And wasn't one thing mentioned in the Bible was about LOVE? So since people are so hip on that book can't they let people love who they want? Or do people have to love whom other people feel they can be allowed to love. The Bible is a book of stories, not facts.