Political signs for Texas House District 54 incumbent Rep. Scott Cosper, R-Killeen, and challenger Dr. Brad Buckley are displayed Monday, May 7, 2018, near the intersection of East Stan Schlueter Loop and Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard in Killeen.

In the final week before Tuesday’s Texas House District 54 runoff, hostile advertising between the two incumbents reached an all-time high.

Incumbent Rep. Scott Cosper and challenger Dr. Brad Buckley, a veterinarian, have been exchanging barbs in the lead-up to Election Day — a significant change in tone from the relatively quiet first few months of the campaign.

In recent weeks, Cosper’s campaign and political action committees funding his campaign have issued a flood of district mailers blasting Buckley for fighting against property appraisal increase caps and “ridiculing” Cosper’s stance on unfunded mandates.

Cosper, 47, who has received a wash of money from committees primarily funded by Speaker of the House Joe Straus, has made a heavy push to shore up his conservative record and paint Buckley as a newcomer without the big-name endorsements Cosper has enjoyed.

Meanwhile, Buckley, 51, has issued a relatively modest number of mailers, with the tone shifting to adversarial as the race has progressed. This past week, Buckley issued a mailer calling out Cosper’s connection to Rep. John Zerwas, a challenger for the Speaker role for the 86th Legislature in 2019.

The content of those mailers could have an impact — for better or worse — on each candidate’s nomination chances Tuesday.

The District 54 runoff is the only House race in the state this Tuesday in which a Republican incumbent faces a challenger, and each candidate’s final pitch could pay dividends in the final polls.

‘Granny tax’

A recent Cosper mailer had an eye-catching title representative of the escalating attacks between the two candidates: “Why is Brad Buckley trying to scare your grandma?”

The issue stems from House Bill 2766 — colloquially known as the “granny tax” — which split House Republican votes in half before dying in the Senate during the 85th Legislature.

Cosper was one of 46 Republicans who voted in support of the bill and called its characterization as a tax a “disgusting myth.”

“(The bill’s) purpose was to bring Texas tax dollars back from Washington and improve nursing home care at zero cost to taxpayers or seniors,” Cosper said in an email. “It is shameful for Brad Buckley to wait until just days before the election to start parroting the same debunked fake news just to win a vote.”

The legislation, co-authored by House District 59 Rep. J.D. Sheffield, R-Gatesville, would have freed up federal Medicaid funds for non-Medicare-funded nursing homes by providing a local match of $11 per occupied bed per day paid for by private facilities. For each local dollar raised, the federal government would match $1.32 — providing an estimated $578 million per year for Medicaid-funded nursing home reinvestment without a dime of state spending.

Supporters of the bill said the program, officially named the Nursing Facility Reinvestment Allowance, would provide more money for chronically underfunded Medicaid-dependent facilities and reward high-performing homes that consistently fill beds.

However, according to the Texas Public Policy Foundation, an Austin-based conservative think tank, the program would have served as an effective tax on nursing homes, disproportionately impacting non-Medicaid nursing facilities that would pay the fee but receive no reimbursement from the program.

“Facilities that pay the assessment but have few/no Medicaid beds will receive no revenue to offset the expense of assessment,” a foundation analysis found. “Such a facility with 100 beds would sustain an annual loss of more than $400,000. How will they survive that financial loss and continue to serve the elderly?”

In addition, the legislation contained no language ensuring reinvestment funds would be allocated for patient care, leaving open the possibility federal funds would be used for corporate profits or administrative overhead.

However, as Cosper outlined in a recent mailer, the bill did include language that the $11 per occupied bed assessment could not be passed directly or indirectly onto facility residents.

Despite the prohibitive language, the Texas Public Policy Foundation said loopholes existed in the bill to allow businesses to effectively place the increased financial burden onto their residents.

“There are loopholes in the wording of HB 2766 that could allow facilities to pass the cost of the tax on to residents,” an analysis read. “Many would be forced to do so to keep their doors open.”

That finding brought about the term “granny tax.”

Buckley said Cosper’s support for the bill, which would bring more federal dollars to the state Medicaid program, was against free market principles and anti-conservative.

“The fact that he supports ‘assessing’ private nursing homes in a way to scheme more federal dollars from a government that is already $20 trillion in debt demonstrates his lack of understanding of basic conservative principles,” Buckley said.

Scaring seniors?

Although it never made the governor’s desk, the “granny tax” bill has been a sticking point for Republican voters who align with Abbott’s January 2017 State of the State pledge — “the only good tax is a dead tax.”

In a Facebook post Tuesday, Buckley said Cosper’s support for the bill was at odds with the governor’s agenda.

“Cosper’s HB 2766 would be a disaster for many Texas nursing home residents,” the post read. “I guess that’s why Cosper joined all the Democrats, but one, and a minority of liberal Republicans to pass this bill.”

In reality, House Republicans voted 46-45 on May 11, 2017, to send the bill to the Senate, with all but one Democrat voting in support. A companion bill originating in the Senate was killed in committee before ever reaching a vote.

In a mailer addressing his support for HB 2766, Cosper said Buckley was “desperate,” “trying to scare seniors” and “hiding behind out-of-town special interests.”

Buckley said those criticisms were off base.

“(Cosper’s) bizarre, vitriolic mailer highlights his attempt to defend the indefensible,” Buckley said. “As far as him accusing me of hiding behind out-of-town special interests, that’s just laughable because it’s exactly what he’s actually doing.”

Buckley, who told the Herald on May 11 he would run a “positive campaign,” has fired shots at Cosper, sending a mailer last week tying Cosper to Rep. John Zerwas, a six-term Katy Republican whom Buckley called a “liberal.”

Zerwas, chairman of the House Appropriations Committee on which Cosper sits, is one of four representatives who have filed for the seat that will be vacated upon the retirement of current Speaker of the House Straus in November.

Zerwas was also one of the co-authors of HB 2766, alongside Sheffield and others, and voted in support of the legislation.

Buckley said his mailer wasn’t an attempt to be negative, but to represent “facts on the ground.”

“My tactics haven’t changed,” Buckley said. “The voters deserve to know the political leanings and history of a Cosper surrogate that advocated strongly on his behalf. If Cosper doesn’t understand that the vote for Speaker is a public policy debate itself, then I don’t think he understands the job description of being a State Representative,”

Cosper called Buckley’s comments on Zerwas “a slap in the face” to the House’s chief budget writer.

“About the speaker question, Brad is downright lying to the voters,” Cosper said. “I signed a pledge to vote in caucus for the next Speaker, and to support the Republican Caucus’s choice. This will ensure that we have a conservative Speaker, chosen by Republicans.”

Final pitches

With just two days to go, the two candidates were mum with the Herald on their campaign strategy this week — including where they have been campaigning.

If recent history is any guide, Tuesday’s runoff results could look vastly different from the primary that preceded them.

In May 2016, Cosper’s runoff challenger, Killeen optometrist Dr. Austin Ruiz, seized the Bell County vote from Cosper after Cosper won the county by more than 300 votes in the primary.

Cosper finished with 1,845 runoff votes in Bell County to Ruiz’s 2,025. With the help of Lampasas County voters, Cosper ended up winning the runoff by a slim 40-vote margin.

In a nearly mirror of 2016, Cosper took Bell County by about 4 points — and a roughly 300 vote lead.

This time around, however, Buckley has the upper hand in the district’s rural areas.

On March 6, Buckley narrowly won Lampasas County voters with 42.24 percent to Cosper’s 42.02 percent. With Bell County included, Cosper was the highest vote getter with 4,472 votes — for 44.56 percent of the electorate — to Buckley’s 4,173 votes, or 41.58 percent. Larry Smith, of Killeen, received 1,390 votes, or 13.85 percent.

With early voting over, both campaigns are in the final push for votes on Tuesday.

“We continue to campaign in all areas,” Buckley said. “We have volunteers all over the district, and we will engage and encourage voters in all areas.”

Cosper said he has remained on message with voters on instituting appraisal increases caps on commercial properties — a clear policy dividing line between him and Buckley.

“I am honestly shocked that Brad Buckley even calls himself a Republican given how hostile he is to limiting out-of-control increases in property tax appraisals,” Cosper said. “Quite frankly, Brad doesn’t understand the issue.”

Personal records

Cosper, a former Killeen City Councilman and mayor, may have to contend with a local record that remains spotty for some residents.

Cosper was one of five council members recalled during a November 2011 special ballot after political fallout from the $750,000 buyout of former Killeen City Manager Connie Green.

Cosper was then mayor 2014 to 2016, during a series of fiscal years in which the City Council approved spending plans that budgeted at a deficit and dipped into the city’s operational fund reserves.

Cosper, who told the Herald he met once a week with then-City Manager Glenn Morrison and judged the city in sound financial health, said he had not been appraised of any financial issues during his time as mayor.

After his election to the state seat in November 2016, Cosper was appointed to the House Appropriations Committee and was named a “most powerful first-term legislator” by Capitol Insider.

Cosper has touted his work to increase disproportionate impact aid for cities like Killeen and Harker Heights that have an unusually high number of state-mandated disabled veteran property tax exemptions, and increase state funding to Fort Hood during his tenure.

Buckley, meanwhile, is a former Killeen school district board member and co-chair of 14 Forward, a private investment initiative to spur business development along the Interstate 14 corridor. | 254-501-7567

(4) comments


This is the personal opinion of this writer.
Copy from another article: 'Bell County commissioners OK $10M in certificates of obligation
Killeen bank to issue the certificates for Bell County' End of copy.

That was a fast and furious delivery of the Bell county commissioners voting to go for a $10 million dollar bond for roads and bridges. It was on the news for about 3 or 4 hours, estimated length of front line exposure.
Copy: 'With that in mind, the Bell County Commissioners Court unanimously approved an order to issue up to $10 million in certificates of obligation — a form of debt that does not need voter approval.' End of copy.
Note: Once again it says, ' a form of debt that does not need voter approval.' Why does it 'not' require voter approval???? Why is it that the commissioners, and all of the others should not be required to ask for voter approval whenever citizens are asked if the council, KISD, commissioners, etc. want to go out and spend money. It is the citizens money, not the council, KISD, Commissioners money.
Copy: 'According to the Texas Comptroller, certificates of obligation can be issued for public improvement projects, buying materials and professional services. Residents can have a say on the issuance if 5 percent of registered voters petition for an election.' End of copy.
In my opinion, this newspaper should have brought this to the attention of citizens and left it on the front news-sheet for a period exceeding 3 or 4 hours before sending it to the historical file. I know this newspaper will say that it can be found in historical storage, but when it is not lift for a considerable time, nobody knows about it to look in the historical file.
I believe this should be returned to the front section of the KDH news and left for at least 7 days to be assured of this being the maximum exposure for citizens to read.
I would suggest that anyone interested, go for the 5 percent interest because 'what are they asking for with the $10 million dollar bond???? What roads, bridges are they asking for repair and/or new construction???? This should be up to the citizen and voted upon I think.
According to the Texas Comptroller, certificates of obligation can be issued for public improvement projects, buying materials and professional services. Residents can have a say on the issuance if 5 percent of registered voters petition for an election.


This is the personal opinion of this writer.

@Don76550: and @centexdave: I agree with both of you. A mayor who did not 'control' his budget allowing it to get out of control for millions, I don't know what the correct number would be as his administration was, in my opinion, completely out of control and in shambles'.

Let Dr. Buckley have a chance and let's see what he can do.

This has been the personal opinion of this writer and nothing shall be used, in context or without or changed in any way without first notifying, and receiving explicit approval from this writer.
One of the 4.42 % who voted.


Cosper is desperately trying to lie his way back into office. He blocked meaningful property tax reform. He helped to block a conservative agenda. He did indeed vote to tax nursing home beds. He voted to eliminate rollback elections for excessive tax hikes in some school districts. He support a liberal house speaker. Cosper cannot be trusted and obviously is incapable of telling the truth. I proudly voted for Dr Buckley, the only true conservative in the race and urge others to do the same.


Voted early. And voted for Dr. Brad Buckley. Please do the same and get rid of the snake in the grass.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.