• November 25, 2014

Living in ‘new normal’

Revelations show how much privacy has eroded since 9/11

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Saturday, June 8, 2013 4:30 am | Updated: 1:13 pm, Mon Aug 19, 2013.

WASHINGTON — Welcome to the new normal, the U.S. national security state that’s grown like mad since the 9/11 terrorist attacks nearly a dozen years ago.

Personal privacy has shrunk. Government secrecy has grown. Law enforcement intrusions, both overt and covert, are routine.

And while airport security lines hint at how life changed following Sept. 11, 2001, the full scope and apparent irrevocability of the changes nearly defy description. Street cameras track your movements. Strangers can read your emails. Police can spy on your political gatherings.

And it’s all become so commonplace that most of the time, like the proverbial frog in a pot of warming water, we take it for granted.

“Some of the impacts have been obscured,” Steven Aftergood, director of the Federation of American Scientists’ Project on Government Secrecy, said Friday. “One could say that personal privacy has been compromised for years, but we are only now becoming aware of it.”

But even in this new normal, a shock or two can awaken the complacent. That’s what happened this week, in a one-two punch.

On Wednesday, Britain’s Guardian newspaper revealed that the National Security Agency is

collecting telephone records of tens of millions of Verizon customers. On Friday, the Guardian and The Washington Post reported that the NSA is tapping directly into the central servers of nine companies including Microsoft, Yahoo, Google and Facebook.

The ensuing uproar provoked President Barack Obama to offer a defense.

“I think it’s important for everybody to understand … that there are some tradeoffs involved,” Obama said Friday. “You can’t have 100 percent security and also then have 100 percent privacy and zero inconvenience. You know, we’re going to have to make some choices as a society.”

In his first remarks on the surveillance program disclosures, Obama said he welcomes a debate but insisted that the nation must strike an appropriate balance between security and civil liberties.

Elizabeth Goitein, co-director of the liberty and national security program at the Brennan Center for Justice at the New York University School of Law, said she hopes this week’s revelations serve as a wakeup call for Americans. But, she said, while she welcomes Obama’s desire for a debate, she noted that it’s difficult when the programs have already started.

In the new normal, political debate can be one-sided. In a similar vein, secret courts make key decisions behind closed doors and say very little about them.

On Friday, Obama said the programs are “fully overseen” not just by Congress but by a special court put together to evaluate such things, all done “consistently with the Constitution and rule of law.”

If anyone wants to go further than the “top-line data” about phone calls, Obama said, “they’d have to go back to a federal judge” and explain why they wanted to dig further into the call information.

While debate is OK, Obama said, however, that he does not “welcome leaks” about the programs. If everything the government does to try to prevent terrorist attacks is “on the front page,” then potential attackers can “get around our preventive measures.”

Intelligence agencies collect data only on when and where calls take place, not their content, he said, and he stressed that those intelligence programs are subject to extensive “checks and balances” from courts and Congress.

The administration’s approach is not “trust me,” he said. “We’ve got congressional oversight and judicial oversight.”

© 2014 McClatchy-Tribune News Service. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

More about

More about

More about

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
  • 2 Don't Threaten or Abuse. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated. AND PLEASE TURN OFF CAPS LOCK.
  • 3 Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
  • 4 Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 5 Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 6 Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.

Welcome to the discussion.

2 comments:

  • jamesorigin posted at 6:28 pm on Sat, Jun 8, 2013.

    jamesorigin Posts: 2

    Also follow the money. Who controls the money controls the world.
    Google ... Jewish Conspiracy Movie, it's 2:44:58 long on youtube. It will explain who controls America.

    Chances are the KDH will not publish anything about the ongoing genocide in Israel against the Palestinians. Or the fact that several Israelis were dancing for joy as the WTC towers fell to the ground back on 9/11. They were there to make a record of the event. Islam is not the enemy and never has been.

     
  • jamesorigin posted at 6:20 pm on Sat, Jun 8, 2013.

    jamesorigin Posts: 2

    "You are about to read a list of 45 goals that found their way down the halls of our great Capitol back in 1963. As you read this, 39 years later, you should be shocked by the events that have played themselves out. Communist Goals (1963) Congressional Record--Appendix, pp. A34-A35 January 10, 1963" ... http://rense.com/general32/americ.htm

    These goals have all been achieved.