• November 28, 2014

Unions rally federal workers to appeal furloughs

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 4:30 am

WASHINGTON — Unions are mounting a new attack on the Obama administration’s decision to furlough nearly one in two federal workers, rallying thousands of their members to appeal the unpaid days off to a little-known review board.

As of 5 p.m. Friday, almost 6,000 appeals had flooded the offices of the small, understaffed Merit Systems Protection Board — about equal to the number of cases it normally handles in a year.

And while the merit board typically hears challenges from civil servants who were demoted, fired or retaliated against for whistleblowing, the overwhelming majority of the recent petitions are from Defense Department civilians. Starting July 8, 650,000 Defense employees took the first of 11 furlough days required as part of the $85 billion in budget cuts across government known as sequestration.

“The message here is, we’re not going to just roll over and take this lying down,” said David Borer, general counsel for the American Federation of Government Employees, the largest federal employee union. “We’re just getting started.”

The AFGE and other unions are holding workshops across the country to instruct members how to file appeals that seek to cancel the furloughs and award back pay. Several unions asked the merit board to consider some appeals as class-action cases.

In addition to Pentagon employees, workers appealed from the Internal Revenue Service; the departments of Homeland Security, Housing and Urban Development, and the Interior; the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission; and the Environmental Protection Agency.

In all, about 775,000 federal workers face furloughs of four to 15 days before the fiscal year ends Sept. 30.

A spokesman for the Office of Management and Budget said it is up to Congress to replace the sequester.

“Because of the sequestration, agencies are being forced to make very difficult decisions, including the use of furloughs, as a means to achieve the spending levels required by Congress,” spokesman Steve Posner said in a statement.

“It is not too late for Congress to fix the sequester and avoid more unnecessary damage to families and to the economy,” he said.

Some employees are claiming their job responsibilities are comparable to those of colleagues who were exempted from furloughs; others said their agency discriminated against them. But for the most part, they are arguing the furloughs are adverse actions the government took without sufficient cause to make its mandated budget cuts.

The agencies could have made deeper cuts to programs and contracts instead, the employees said. As evidence, some cited statements by Navy officials in April that they could eliminate furloughs for about 201,000 Navy and Marine Corps civilians by shifting money in the budget.

Leaders of other smaller departments in Defense said they could do the same.

But Pentagon officials insisted furloughs be spread across all Defense agencies to share the pain.

“We have looked at all options to meet these cuts and believe one option must, unfortunately, be furloughs,” said Lt. Cmdr. Nate Christensen, a Defense spokesman, noting that civilian pay takes up more than a third of the agency’s operating budget. “The guiding principle . . . was the preservation of the readiness of the force to accomplish the department’s mission to ensure our national security.”

Merit board overwhelmed

The merit board is scrambling to assign each of the cases to its approximately 50 administrative judges. Already understaffed because it is not filling vacancies to meet its own sequestration cuts, the board is overwhelmed with appeals arriving electronically, by fax and by regular mail.

On Thursday alone, 575 petitions arrived at the board’s eight field offices, compared with about 20 suspensions, demotions, removals and other challenges to personnel actions that federal employees file on a typical day.

“Right now, the biggest thing we’re dealing with is entering the information into the system,” said James Eisenmann, the merit board’s executive director, who expects the number of cases to grow and has authorized overtime for his staff to process them. “It’s a massive undertaking.”

The flood of petitions is renewing questions about what government owes its employees as it tries to shrink spending — whether people should be spared before programs and contracts, or if they represent just another budget line item.

“Hopefully, our cases will get notoriety for Congress to actually understand and see what’s going on,” said Aaron Walker, a 57-year-old systems analyst for the Defense Logistics Agency in Columbus, Ohio.

Like his colleagues, Walker will lose 20 percent of his pay over 11 weeks to help the Pentagon save $1.8 billion. He filed an appeal electronically Thursday.

Lengthy process

The process can be lengthy. An employee has 30 days from the first furlough day to file. A judge can decide the case based on paperwork, or the employee can request a hearing. It took judges 93 days on average last year to rule on each case. The losing party can appeal to a three-member panel, which takes 240 days on average to issue a decision.

Union officials acknowledge that winning will not be easy. Federal agencies generally have discretion to decide how they meet their budgets. In the only sequester-related appeal to be decided so far, the judge ruled in favor of the furloughing agency, the EPA.

But the unions hope that the large number of appeals might not only get their members back pay, but could also prompt Congress to reverse course on the sequester, which is likely to continue into next year and beyond.

The employees must prove that the furloughs do not “promote the efficiency of the federal service,” the standard in personnel cases.

“We think they could have made other decisions, like cutting contracts,” said Colleen Kelley, president of the National Treasury Employees Union, which has filed grievances directly with the IRS seeking back pay for 80,000 workers. About 100 have appealed to the merit board.

If a large number of employees was to win appeals, the rulings could force agencies to find new savings to meet the mandated spending cuts this fiscal year.

But in the absence of legal precedent on whether furloughs are an appropriate response to budget cuts, judges might decline to second-guess an agency’s discretion, some attorneys said.

More about

More about

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
  • 2 Don't Threaten or Abuse. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated. AND PLEASE TURN OFF CAPS LOCK.
  • 3 Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
  • 4 Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 5 Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 6 Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.

Welcome to the discussion.

4 comments:

  • Dr Strangelove posted at 2:28 pm on Wed, Jul 24, 2013.

    Dr Strangelove Posts: 550

    Oh please just by your comment we can see you’re a Democrat and Obama supporter. The Union supported Obama, the people that I know that belongs to the union on Fort Hood are diehard democrats. So please stop drinking the Kool-Aid.

     
  • JohnnyinHarkerHeights posted at 1:15 pm on Wed, Jul 24, 2013.

    JohnnyinHarkerHeights Posts: 44

    The laugh is on you. The overwhelming percentage of Defense Department civilian employees are Republican and vote Republican. That they are union does not automatically make them Democratic Party members because a lot of times they had to join a union as part of getting the job. They did not vote for President Obama you can be sure of that so they deserve what they are getting because the Republican congressman in the house are the ones responsible for this not President Obama. In your eagerness to make fun of the federal employees you missed the rich irony that so many Republicans with Denver run to the Union they probably hate for help. I wonder if any of them realize that is what a union is 4, to stand up to an employer when an individual alone has no chance one on one. From any of them this is the first time they are actually going to their union and using its services. Maybe this will wake them up. Maybe they'll realize all the garbage Fox News keeps telling everyone is about them and their union the one organization that if kept strong can help them again power. I won't hold my breath though.

     
  • Dr Strangelove posted at 8:25 am on Wed, Jul 24, 2013.

    Dr Strangelove Posts: 550

    HAHAHAHAHAHA! You union workers backed Obama you wanted change well you got it—so stop crying. In the civilian world hours are cutback all the time—welcome to the real world; we are so laughing at you Obama voters.

    [beam]

     
  • Bubba posted at 8:24 am on Wed, Jul 24, 2013.

    Bubba Posts: 753

    The alternative is to cut TDA positions and jobs, and send employees to the unemployment line.

    My advice is to shut up, go back to work, and be thankful you have a job, and endure the furloughs. Or you can join the military and then be helpless as Congress withholds your pay as they pass budgets.