• November 26, 2014

Killeen accepts highest bid for uniform services

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Related Stories

Posted: Thursday, September 26, 2013 4:30 am | Updated: 4:19 pm, Wed Feb 19, 2014.

The Killeen City Council accepted the highest of three bids it received for uniform services, stating the chosen vendor was “the best value for the city.”

Karlene Jessie, city purchasing manager, said Zip Cleaners, whose bid was more than $50,000 higher than the lowest bid submitted, will provide the rental and cleaning of uniforms for the city’s aviation, public works, community services and support services staff.

The city received three bids: $83,536 from G&K Services, $96,915 from Prudential Overall Supply, Inc., and Zip Cleaners’ bid of $134,212.

The city currently has a contract with Zip Cleaners for the police and fire departments, code enforcement and municipal court uniforms.

Jessie said the city has had contracts with all three vendors that submitted bids, but the one recommended by staff was the “most responsible bidder, best value for the city and (staff) did not solely focus on the lowest bid.”

Stuart McLennan, executive director of support services, said the highest bid was still $20,000 under what the city has budgeted for its 2014 fiscal year, and although Zip Cleaners’ bid is $134,000, it doesn’t necessarily mean the city will spend that much on the service.

It depends on how much city employees use the service.

Jessie said during the bidding process, city staff formed a committee to gather feedback from employees who would be affected by the contract change. She said employees using the services of the current vendors the city has contracts with gave “unsatisfactory” marks.

Jessie said the contract is for rental and cleaning and states that the vendor is responsible for wear and tear to uniforms that are of no fault of the employee and they are required to replace torn uniforms.

“(The vendor) provides the uniform and the service to keep (city staff) looking professional,” she said. “That is not currently happening. We have testimonials from employees whose uniforms have been torn. They were asked to replace them and the vendor says ‘no’ and patches them.”

Councilman Terry Clark said he was “convinced” by Jessie and McLennan’s discussion with the council to support allowing the city to enter into a contract with Zip Cleaners.

“If one of our city employees is showing up in a uniform that has been patched multiple times, it doesn’t really send a strong image,” he said. “A lot of times our citizens’ only reaction with our city government is when they’re asking for a service to be provided to them.”

The council approved, 5-2, the contract with Zip Cleaners. Councilmen Jonathan Okray and Steve Harris voted against it.

McLennan said the contract will begin in mid-October and run through 2015. He said when the contract expires the city can combine all its uniform services contracts into one, saying that it’s “in the best interest of the city.”

More about

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
  • 2 Don't Threaten or Abuse. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated. AND PLEASE TURN OFF CAPS LOCK.
  • 3 Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
  • 4 Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 5 Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 6 Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.

Welcome to the discussion.

4 comments:

  • Eliza posted at 7:15 pm on Thu, Sep 26, 2013.

    Eliza Posts: 867

    @ think about it, if their thoughts are so similar in many aspects and some people speak bad about them, what can we say then about some of the others who have rarely voted differently with one another
    ----------------
    Good Point

     
  • Citizen posted at 8:54 am on Thu, Sep 26, 2013.

    Citizen Posts: 1

    @oldwoman
    "Huh? Jessie "said employees using the services of the current vendors the city has contracts with gave “unsatisfactory” marks." Isn't that Zip Cleaners?"

    No, the current vendor is G&K. That's who the city is unhappy with.

     
  • overseer posted at 8:16 am on Thu, Sep 26, 2013.

    overseer Posts: 45

    @oldwoman
    Well spoken. I have noticed something as well regarding the stories in the newspaper regarding various issues. Do you ever notice that some stories always print "the good points" of one side of a vote but never prints why the minority council members voted against something. They must have had a reason to vote it down. From what I see, Councilman Okray and Harris seem to vote alike on most issues but, not on all. They have been criticized for their voting similarities by some but; think about it, if their thoughts are so similar in many aspects and some people speak bad about them, what can we say then about some of the others who have rarely voted differently with one another as well.
    I just want to know, what were the reasons Okray and Harris voted no It may be of a benefit to the public and myself to know. Can anyone help me out with this? Also, let's try to hold the paper more responsible in printing both points of views on a deal such as this. I am going to go back and read over the past agenda information for this over the weekend to see what I can find out for myself. I will also try to reach out to them to ask why they voted against it.

     
  • OldWoman posted at 6:45 am on Thu, Sep 26, 2013.

    OldWoman Posts: 28

    Huh? Jessie "said employees using the services of the current vendors the city has contracts with gave “unsatisfactory” marks." Isn't that Zip Cleaners?
    Why do we have the bidding process? Why do we not just shop around for "best" services?
    Rumor has it that Stu (as he is called) is said to be thick friends with the Zip Cleaners guy in charge... you figure out the rest.
    I suggest we either do away with the bidding process, and openly pick our cronies to get city money, or we ADHERE to the bidding process as it was designed to avoid overcharging and WASTING tax dollars.