• October 30, 2014

Redistricting case could delay Texas primaries

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Monday, August 12, 2013 4:30 am

AUSTIN — Politicians across the state are announcing their candidacies and hiring campaign workers, but the ongoing battle over redistricting could again delay the March primaries and make life difficult for incumbents.

Lawyers working for Attorney General Greg Abbott and minority groups filed briefs with a San Antonio federal court that hint at a knock-down, drag-out fight over the state’s political maps and election laws. The fight has intensified since U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder said he wants Texas to submit all proposed election law changes for federal approval before implementing them.

Lawsuit first filed in May 2011

Minority groups first filed their lawsuit against Texas’ new political maps on May 9, 2011, when the Legislature created them following the 2010 census. Because the case was underway, three federal judges in San Antonio drew temporary legislative and congressional maps for the state to use for the 2012 elections.

Abbott didn’t like those maps, so he appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, which agreed with him that the maps went too far, absent a verdict in the case. The protracted legal wrangling delayed the 2012 primary from March 6 to May 29.

Now after a landmark Supreme Court decision and another legislative session, the fight is still on in San Antonio. The Legislature tried to end the lawsuit by throwing out the 2011 maps that a Washington, D.C., court declared intentionally discriminatory and replacing them with the 2012 maps drawn by the San Antonio judges.

Minority groups said that’s not good enough because those maps include many of the same discriminatory elements drawn by the Legislature in 2011. They want the judges to draw new maps from scratch and require Texas to submit any other changes to election law for court or Justice Department review.

Abbott opposes all the delays

Abbott opposes all of this and wants the case dropped.

In court papers, he signaled that he’s ready to go to the Supreme Court if he doesn’t get his way. “A judicially imposed preclearance requirement is no less extraordinary and no less constitutionally suspect,” Abbott wrote.

That places the San Antonio judges in a tough spot because time is running out for the spring primary elections. County clerks said they need to know what political maps to use by September to comfortably register candidates by Dec. 1 in order to vote March 4.

If the court rules in favor of the minority groups, the judges will need time to draw new maps and give the state a chance to appeal their decision. These appeals can take weeks, and thus delay the primary.

© 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

More about

More about

More about

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
  • 2 Don't Threaten or Abuse. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated. AND PLEASE TURN OFF CAPS LOCK.
  • 3 Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
  • 4 Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 5 Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 6 Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.

Welcome to the discussion.

Featured Events