Killeen’s interim city manager and city council seem to be in a big hurry to shore up the city’s finances.

Unfortunately, they don’t seem to have the same sense of urgency about initiating a promised forensic audit of those finances.

In a 5-1 vote Tuesday, council members tentatively approved a “one-time transfer” of more than $1.6 million from the city’s solid waste fund to the city’s general fund — a move that would place the general fund balance within city policy’s recommended range of 22 to 25 percent of operational expenditures.

The solid waste fund transfer isn’t the only means the city has identified to replenish the city’s dwindling fund balance, which stood at 18.7 percent of expenditures when the current budget was adopted. At city staff’s recommendation, the council also endorsed eliminating the fleet replacement program, freeing up funding across several departments; identifying “targeted cuts and revenue sources” and utilizing a multi-year approach to expenditures.

The net result is a $1.78 million increase in the fund balance over last year, but the solid waste fund transfer accounted for nearly all of that amount.

Councilman Richard “Dick” Young voted against the transfer, saying he didn’t think it was appropriate to move money from an enterprise fund to the general fund — likening it to moving money from one pocket to another.

Young has a point, and there’s an ethical question here as well. The vast majority of the money in the solid waste fund comes from ratepayers, so they should have reason to believe it is used for related equipment and services, rather than being disbursed for general use.

In addition, customers have a legitimate argument that if the city’s solid waste fund has the money for a sizeable cash transfer, the city is overcharging them —  or should provide more services, like twice-weekly pickup or recycling.

The council is moving forward on outsourcing the city’s solid waste services. If Killeen contracts out its trash collection, the city will see a potential cash influx for the sale of its fleet of trucks, lower fuel and maintenance costs, a smaller payroll and lower employee benefit outlays. In short, the city stands to receive a major one-time revenue boost.

With that in mind, why did interim City Manager Dennis Baldwin see the need to rush money into the city’s general fund?

One possible reason is the city’s bond rating. With a declining general fund balance — one that was projected to fall to 13.9 percent of operating expenses in fiscal year 2018 — city officials may be trying to head off a possible downgrading of the rating, which would mean costlier borrowing for city projects.

Still, the solid waste fund shouldn’t be used as a piggy bank, as it has been frequently in the past. In 2014, for example, then-City Manager Glenn Morrison pushed for an $8.5 million transfer from three enterprise funds to shore up the sagging general fund. If the council signs off on this transfer, it will be legitimizing previous administrations’ questionable budget practices in this area — practices the upcoming city audit may scrutinize.

Unfortunately, council discussions about the audit haven’t reflected the same urgency as those involving the funds transfer.

Last week, Councilman Jim Kilpatrick, the audit committee chairman, presented a time line that would delay contract talks with an outside audit firm until the new city auditor starts work in mid-January, with contract approval set for Feb. 14. The first progress update isn’t scheduled until March 27 — just six weeks before the next city election.

And to date, the council is leaning toward hiring a firm that has proposed an investigation that falls short of a full forensic audit — though residents demanded one at several city budget hearings.

It’s time to stop commingling city funds and kicking the audit can down the road.

Killeen’s residents certainly deserve better. | 254-501-7543

(3) comments


This is the personal opinion of this writer.
@Rooadwgs98: Yes I agree with you, in my opinion this city is continuing to play the peanut and shell game with the citizens of this city, and will continue to do so until 'this city grows up and takes a serious look at what's going on.
@Armain: Yes I agree with you in the fact that the citizens of this town are getting charged too much for the service they are getting.
I still stand on the fact that 'When you pull 1.4 million out of the general fund and then go ahead and vote to increase of this city's outsourcing by 1.4 million, you cannot say that 'to increase the general fund by this 1.4 million dollars will increase the available funds to this general fund if you in turn vote to spend 1.4 million dollars. This just does not add up to me.
And if I am not mistaken, isn't Jim Kilpatrick the one who when this mess started raising say 'he trusts the In Charge individual at that time' to see to the city's operation, that he was not going to micromanage that person, and who do they place in a responsible charge of the audit committee, old blood and guts Kilpatrick himself. Talk about the fox and the chickens.
Yes Martha, there is a Santa Claus and it seems like it is this city council, but not for much longer as this routine will result in this city going broke or we replace this entire city administration.
This has been a presentation of my personal opinion and nothing more should be attuned to it than has been presented here.
One of the few who voted in this last election.


It sure seems as if we are being overcharged quite a bit on these services if they have that much extra money. The way I read this is they seem to use the extra to pay for city vehicles and other expenses. I would like to see a cut in the cost of these services.


The city has always had champagne taste on a beer budget. This cluster started years ago and has just continued to snowball and it will keep repeating until someone has the cajones to stop and regroup

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.