• October 31, 2014

Questions remain in aftermath of water line accident

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Sunday, July 27, 2014 4:30 am

Two weeks after a construction accident caused a water shortage that crippled Fort Hood and impacted surrounding communities, questions remain regarding how the incident was handled.

The July 12 accident, in which a 48-inch water main feeding a treatment plant on Belton Lake was severed, left the plant operating at a quarter of its capacity and impacted Copperas Cove, Harker Heights, Killeen and Fort Hood.

Though the accident occurred about 2 p.m. on a Saturday, media outlets weren’t notified until the following morning. And although officials with Bell County Water Control and Improvement District No. 1, which operates the plant, promised a full report by last week, details surrounding the incident have been slow to emerge.

One reason may be the lack of documentation pertaining to the accident. WCID-1 General Manager Jerry Atkinson told the Herald most of the accident response was conducted by phone.

More concerning is the revelation that the damaged pipeline is not in the database for Texas 811, a system to help contractors locate utility lines before they dig. The worker who cut the water line reportedly called 811 before digging but no information on the line was available.

The missing information was not simply an oversight. Water transmission and distribution lines — as well as sewer lines — are not required to be registered with Texas 811, as are gas, electric and communications lines. Atkinson said last week the district does not intend to register the water lines, citing technological requirements the district currently lacks.

Atkinson noted the transmission and distribution lines are clearly marked on deeds and surveys available through the county clerk’s office.

Still, the accident happened — and the consequences were anything but minor.

A total of 29 million gallons of water were lost, but to date neither the worker who caused the break nor the contractor he worked for have been officially identified. Atkinson suggested fines are unlikely, but the district plans to recoup the lost money, which includes $70,000 in repairs.

The effects of the break were felt across two counties. In Copperas Cove, officials placed the city in Stage 5 conservation mode, forcing local restaurants to close. The city’s Mountain Top tank was depleted, leaving some residents without water.

In Killeen, the city closed its swimming pools for two days and initiated Stage 4 water restrictions.

But perhaps the biggest impact was felt at Fort Hood, where water shortages caused officials to operate the post with only mission-essential personnel the Monday after the line break. The installation closed child care facilities and canceled outpatient services at Carl R. Darnall Army Medical Center. In addition, AAFES closed all food-service facilities.

Water supplies were largely back to normal within three days, but the incident illustrates how a seemingly minor construction accident can have serious and far-reaching consequences.

Moving forward, it is crucial that the water district review its procedures. Improving methods of notifying the public and better coordination with developers and contractors in advance of construction projects should be top considerations.

State lawmakers should push for mandatory inclusion of water lines in the 811 database, so that contractors have real-time access to information on the location of all buried utility lines. Legislation also should include funding to make the necessary mapping technology accessible to utility districts statewide.

Looking long term, Fort Hood should consider an initiative to achieve self-sufficiency with its water supply. Though such a project would require federal approval, it is a crucial need. Indeed, amid legitimate concerns about terrorism and acts of aggression by foreign nations, it is ironic the post could be shut down by a construction worker with an errant backhoe.

In this case, the damage was repaired quickly; the impact could have been worse. But the water district and state officials must take the necessary steps to ensure it doesn’t happen again.

This unfortunate incident must not be viewed as simply water under the bridge.

More about

More about

More about

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
  • 2 Don't Threaten or Abuse. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated. AND PLEASE TURN OFF CAPS LOCK.
  • 3 Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
  • 4 Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 5 Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 6 Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.

Welcome to the discussion.

4 comments:

  • Eliza posted at 5:39 pm on Sun, Jul 27, 2014.

    Eliza Posts: 835

    [thumbup]

     
  • DawgDave posted at 4:00 pm on Sun, Jul 27, 2014.

    DawgDave Posts: 160

    I agree Eliza. Everyone knows which construction company it was. By not "officially" naming them it shows they are protecting them. Just what I would expect with the good ole boys who run Bell County and Killeen.
    Atkinson states a formal report will be out in 2 months or so. That's a joke.
    He'll recoup the expenses of this? Sure he will - just raise the water rates. I find it ironic that Cove has already announced an increase in water rates.

     
  • Eliza posted at 1:14 pm on Sun, Jul 27, 2014.

    Eliza Posts: 835

    @ A total of 29 million gallons of water were lost,

    but to date neither the worker who caused the break nor the contractor he worked for have been officially identified. Atkinson suggested fines are unlikely, but the district plans to recoup the lost money, which includes $70,000 in repairs.
    ----------

    I believe the people have a need to know- Who the contractor was, and the worker/s that were working for them on this job. Also what experience in this form of work did the worker/s have and who was the onsite person in charge.

    For this incident to have caused the slow down of not only 2 counties water supply, But a major halt on a Major Military Installation like Ft Hood, those who are responsible need to be named and documented.

    KDH needs to pursue all measures to find out all the information ,The people have a need and a right to know.
    And KDH needs to do a follow up to ensure that the citizens,
    Will Not be held accountable for any of the cost of the mishap which they had no knowledge of until ,It had to be told.

     
  • Hoosier posted at 8:35 am on Sun, Jul 27, 2014.

    Hoosier Posts: 1

    Indiana we have had Mandatory participation in Indiana 811 since 2004. Before the should be simple was changed we had the same requirement for excavators to visit the County Recorders office every time they intended to dig, to research who had underground facilities within the Township. It didn't work at all. With the technology available today, there is no excuse for a underground facility owner not to want to participate in the process. For a fee of $.90 we will notify our members of the excavation activities near their facilities. I am not sure what Texas 811 charges but it is pretty close to that.

    We (as all 811 centers do) utilize a GIS mapping system where our members select an area where they wish to be notified of excavation activities. This area can be as little as a 200 foot buffer around the centerline of their facilities, or as big as their regulated service territory, it is up to them... When a excavator calls us we gather information about them, and the excavation site. We use this information to draw a polygon around the area they will be digging. If the dig site polygon intersects with a members service area polygon we send what we call a locate request to the member, and they can mark the approximate location of their facilities to avoid damages like this one.

    National statistics show that damage occurs less than 1% of the time as long as the call is made! and everyone participates in the process.... It isn't rocket science...

     

Featured Events