The Killeen City Council is apparently moving ahead on a new city manager search, but there’s much to be done before a new top executive is in place.

Barring a change of heart by former Corpus Christi City Manager Ron Olson — the council’s first choice for the position, who withdrew from consideration — the city will be starting over with the current search firm. In doing so, the council will be committing to a time line that may not yield a new city manager until May.

That’s problematic, for several reasons.

First, it leaves the city in an extended period of uncertainty, with interim City Manager Dennis Baldwin filling in for upwards of six months, when many originally had anticipated a six-week transition.

That leaves the question of what role Baldwin should play in the weeks and months ahead. Since his appointment in early October, he has proposed several ambitious initiatives, including a restructuring of the city’s administration, reshaping the police department — which he oversaw for 12 years before assuming his current post — and a plan to shift operations at City Hall to the city’s Arts and Activities Center.

If Baldwin is inclined to pursue further large-scale initiatives, it must be with the understanding that those actions could conflict with the strategies of the person eventually chosen for the post.

Another problem with an extended search is that the clock is ticking on the city’s 2018 budget.

After the protracted and contentious budget process that played out this summer under former interim City Manager Ann Farris, the council has taken a more proactive approach to closing the anticipated revenue gap in the coming fiscal year — an approach Baldwin has adopted as well.

However, under the current search timeline, a new city manager would arrive just as the budget process kicks into high gear, which could lead to a conflict in budget strategies and management styles. Obviously, that’s something the council would have to consider during the interview process.

The search timeline also means the current council may be doing the hiring, but not all members may have a chance to work with the person chosen for the job.

That’s because municipal elections take place in May, at which time four district council seats will be up for election.

Council members Shirley Fleming, Richard “Dick” Young, Jim Kilpatrick and Mayor Pro Tem Brockley Moore will all see their current terms come to an end. If any of them lose their re-election bids or choose not to seek another term, the new city manager will start a job working under some people he or she is unfamiliar with. That’s far from an ideal situation for a new administrator.

Finally, a quick hire is critical with respect to Killeen’s forensic audit. It’s imperative that the city have someone in place who can be aggressive about advancing the audit process, ensuring its integrity and keeping the issue a top priority.

Ultimately, Killeen has too much at stake to accommodate a leisurely timeline for a new city manager search.

If the city’s current search firm, Keller-based Strategic Government Resources, can’t work with the council to produce a new group of finalists within three months, the council should look to another company to get the job done.

Despite the council’s agreement last week on a new process that would identify 10 semifinalists by January and then vet them for the job, some council members were hesitant to continue the agreement with SGR. They had a right to be. Many of the candidates SGR presented as finalists lacked experience and had red flags in their work history.

True, starting from scratch would mean spending more than the $27,000 already invested in SGR, but it may be time to look to a company that can work more quickly — and deliver stronger candidates.

It’s a small price to pay when investing in the city’s future.

dmiller@kdhnews.com | 254-501-7543

(1) comment

Alvin

This is the personal opinion of this writer.
First, Since the leading contender for the position of City Manager has withdrawn from consideration, don't entertain any notion of 'giving him a 2nd chance'. He withdrew his name, so we don't want to give him any consideration at all. Look for another candidate that wants the job.
As to 'Dennis Baldwin going in to fulfill a position for an anticipated 6 week period, Does this give one the impression that this city government is still toying with the citizens of this city??? He was the only one that was put forward in compliance with the city's objective of 'an interim city manager' who would fill this imposing gap in the city's internal management, now he is stating that 'it was only going to be for a short time period'. Additionally, if the interim city manager did take the position, why then is he going about starting/removing any/all positions/work assignments when he was only to stay in this position for a limited 6 week duration??? In my opinion, this being an interim position, he should 'wait' until the new city manager is put into the position.
I think I remember the interim city manager stating that he had instructed all division/department heads to start working on a 2017/2018 budget and it was to be completed by November 11, 2016. What is the status of this new 2017/2018 budget???
As to 'this new city council working with the new city manager, with the position of city manager being filled, the new city manager is going to be new to all party's concerned so what is the difference of whether or not the city council has a new face or not??? In certain respects it would be an asset to 'start fresh with new faces.
As for as the forensic audit is concerned, Don't wait on the city manager, interim or not, get the ball rolling.
And as to the time line and whether or not the council can/will work with the SGR Organization, I my opinion, it's already been shown that this company cannot/will not do the job selecting an individual for the position of city manager, so 'why wait', select another company and get on with this process.
One of the unknown number who voted.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.