• October 30, 2014

Filibuster against Hagel frustrates reader

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Sunday, February 17, 2013 4:30 am

To The Editor:

Politics is a maddening and frustrating topic even to those of us who are also fascinated by it.

One of the most frustrating things currently is the filibuster against the confirmation of secretary of defense nominee Sen. Chuck Hagel.

The Pentagon now has no one in charge to guide and protect our soldiers in Afghanistan and around the world.

Is getting even for some policy difference 10 years ago a good enough reason to require 60 votes for confirmation?

Is Congress now about schoolyard macho rather than national governance?

Perhaps Sen. Hagel’s turnaround on the Iraq War matters to some but most of us like to see our legislators actually legislate rather than earn money for doing nothing but get even.

National security is on the line and we need the confirmation now.

The soldiers and their families at Fort Hood and around the world deserve better.

Glenda Turck

Killeen

More about

More about

More about

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
  • 2 Don't Threaten or Abuse. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated. AND PLEASE TURN OFF CAPS LOCK.
  • 3 Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
  • 4 Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 5 Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 6 Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.

Welcome to the discussion.

4 comments:

  • Smithjr38 posted at 10:43 am on Wed, Feb 20, 2013.

    Smithjr38 Posts: 114

    Hagel has stepped on his own wrench at the hearings . As he appeared confused and lost.

     
  • sammisj posted at 12:33 pm on Tue, Feb 19, 2013.

    sammisj Posts: 5

    Of course Hagel being the first enlisted person to be Secretary would have nothing to do with it - didn't go to Annapolis like some politicians

     
  • Dr Strangelove posted at 10:36 am on Sun, Feb 17, 2013.

    Dr Strangelove Posts: 525

    Ms. Turck, do you really think the Pentagon and our military cannot operate or protect ourselves because there is not some flunky politician in charge—you know nothing about our military. As for Hagel like most politicians I trust as far as I can throw a tank. For the serge the Pentagon asked for so many thousands of troops did they get it? NO! Your guy the President didn’t give what the Pentagon asked for—he’s the reason our military is cannot protect themselves not his flunky. The President denied soldiers died.

     
  • Bubba posted at 8:08 am on Sun, Feb 17, 2013.

    Bubba Posts: 727

    hagel's "turnaround" on the Iraq war shows that he will stab our troops in the back the first chance he gets if it is politically expedient. Just like obama flipped over Iraq and every war policy of his predecessor. I remember when the politicians badmouthed our troops,tried to cut off their funding and leave them high and dry in Iraq. Now they will reap what they have sown. Rather than assuage your ego, why don't we choose the right people for these jobs, eh glenda?

     

Featured Events