To the Editor:

I, as well as many people I know, have been thoroughly disgusted by the silly antics and lack of constructive achievement by the Congress for at least the last two or three years.

Perhaps it would send a signal to those “lawmakers” if there were an understanding that, unless they showed a willingness to work together on the people’s business instead of their own narrow agenda and to stop being so obstructionist, they would not be paid during the following year.

Actually, at the present, I think that many of the members of Congress should have to return to the Treasury the salaries they have received over the last three years. They certainly did not earn that money.

Ben Liles, Salado

(5) comments

Baylor

I believe if congress allowed themselves to be completely transparent and allowed someone to peel back every benefit and payoff that has come their way, it would prove everyone of them are crooked. I will never vote for an incumbent.

wilcfry
wilcfry

While I understand the frustration that might lead to such a suggestion, the suggestion itself is a tad nonsensical, isn't it?

First, most members of congress (both House and Senate) don't need those salaries anyway; it's a kind of "bonus" for them on top of the significant wealth they already possessed. (There are exceptions of course.)

Secondly, and perhaps more importantly, who gets to sit in judgment of whether they're "doing their jobs" or not? And who gets to choose that person? Would that person have a perspective from the left, who would deny the salaries only to those they perceive as obstructionist Republicans? Or would that person have a perspective from the right, and deny salaries to the Democrats who they perceive to be causing the issues?

Thirdly, though it sounds lame any time someone says it, we actually do have the power to "fire" them every few years (two for the House, six for the Senate). If the majority of citizens are convinced Sen. A or Rep. B is worthless, they'll replace him or her.

While the left is convinced Mr. Cruz is part of the problem, Texans will re-elect him, won't we? And while the right is convinced Mrs. Pelosi is part of the problem, San Franciscans will likely send her back to the House.

barbie500
barbie500

Don't they get a retirement after being in Congress?

wilcfry
wilcfry

Yes they do. From the Senate website's FAQ:

"Members of Congress are eligible for a pension at age 62 if they have completed at least five years of service. They are eligible for a pension at age 50 if they have completed 20 years of service, or at any age after completing 25 years of service. The amount of the pension depends on years of service and the average of the highest three years of salary. By law, the starting amount of a member’s retirement annuity may not exceed 80 percent of his or her final salary."

:-) So vote them out soon.

Roody2
Roody2

I guess you haven't heard... The president doesn't need Congress anymore. He has "a pen and a phone."

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.