Horace Grace

Horace Grace, a local water expert, says that rights to drinking water in reservoirs like Stillhouse Hollow Lake behind him, and Belton Lake also, already have been sold.

Driving over the Belton Lake and Stillhouse Hollow dams, many folks might be tempted to think Central Texas is has drinking water aplenty.

It is a mistaken impression, according to local water experts as well as state and regional water planners. That water has been sold.

Emily Hilley-Sierzchula is a contributor to Tex Appeal Magazine.

0
0
0
0
0

(1) comment

Alvin

This is the personal opinion of this writer.

Copy: 'It is a mistaken impression, according to local water experts as well as state and regional water planners. That water has been sold.' End of copy.

In my opinion, this is a misconception brought on my state and regional water planners for 'God' is the only one that can 'cause it to rain'.

Copy: 'Of course, everyone needs water to live. Between 2020 and 2070, statewide demands could increase around 17 percent while during the same period existing water supplies are expected to decline approximately 11 percent, according to the Texas Water Development Board’s 2017 State Water Plan.
“We need to get prepared now,” Grace said. “Water is a precious and finite resource we can’t live without.” End of copy.

So are we in a state of continual depletion with numbers ranging from 11 percent declination????

What is the state of Texas doing about this???? If we look at the recent Hurricane, where they opened the gates to 'control flooding', thereby sacrificing thousands of homes, Then I think that we brought on a state of 'double negatives', We did not do anything as a source of prevention and the state of our protection was again inadequate, thus by not doing anything, we once again suffered hundreds of billions of dollars which cost us all by the increase in insurance rates. And this has gone on for many years.

Copy: 'Neither Belton nor Stillhouse lakes belong to Bell County; rather, they belong to the federal government through the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Flood control, not drinking water supply, is their primary purpose.'

Continuation of copy: 'Of course, the takeover in 2015 of the Chisholm Trail Special Utility District by the City of Georgetown is still a hot topic in Killeen. “Killeen has a lot of interest,” Grace said.'

Continuation of copy: “Killeen and Bell County both should have been aware that Chisholm had financial problems and could have made an offer to buy them.” End of copy.

I was made aware of this problem by a councilman, but nobody paid any heed to what was going on and as a result, Georgetown preceded to get the ownership in the Chisholm Trail, which I understand, is connected to Stillhouse. But my question is; 'Why isn't this being pursued by the city of Killeen instead of the lawyers of the future housing project???? Why isn't our legal team that is paid by the city of Killeen going after that tooth and nail????

Copy: 'The law of the land in Texas is “full right to capture,” which gives the person with the biggest straw the right to water beneath, regardless of neighbors’ needs. In regions with groundwater conservation districts, “modified right to capture” is the law, Aaron explained. “The private property’s owner right to use groundwater is still in place, just not at the expense of neighbors.”

Continuation of copy: 'Central Texas counties are in Groundwater Management Area 8, which includes the Trinity and Edwards aquifers. In Bell County, Clearwater Underground Water Conservation District employees use computer modeling to keep track of the amount of water in the aquifers.'

Continuation of copy: 'Clearwater allows only so much water to be pumped, based on the “desired future condition” for each aquifer, or how low the aquifer safely can go.' End of copy.

This is a duality. First you say 'The law of the land in Texas is “full right to capture', then you say, ' Central Texas counties are in Groundwater Management Area 8, which includes the Trinity and Edwards aquifers', which is followed up by the statement, ' Clearwater allows only so much water to be pumped'. In my opinion, 'this does not compute'.

I agree:

Copy:
“One day there could be a big fight when some municipalities have overages and others have shortages ... there is not a law in place to deal with that situation so city planners need to be talking about this already,”

Continuation of copy: 'In December 2015, the city of Georgetown acquired the 13,000 acre-feet of groundwater rights in the Chisholm Trail Special Utility District. Many well water users are concerned about the drawing down of the delicate aquifers that are slow to recharge and are used by many.'

Continuation of copy: 'Clearwater allows only so much water to be pumped, based on the “desired future condition” for each aquifer, or how low the aquifer safely can go.
It’s all about being neighborly.' End of copy.
So why isn't that the plan throughout the hole of Texas???? What about the case just recently that a farmer was having to lower his pumps about 80 to 100 foot further down in the Aquifer to have sufficient depth over his pump because of a company, it appears, that is pumping too much water out of the aquifer????
Copy: “In areas without a groundwater conservation district, a landowner can take as much groundwater as he wants, at the expense of neighbors,” said Dirk Aaron, general manager of the Clearwater Underground Water Conservation District. He has managed the district for seven years.
Continuation of copy: 'Clearwater encourages applicants to recapture, recycle and reuse water. “We haven’t had combative applications but we’ve had disagreements that have forced us to find balance between the needs of the business and the long-term needs of neighbors,” Aaron said.'

Continuation of copy: 'Clearwater is managing aquifer pumping so that in 2070, at least 70 percent of the current groundwater will still be there.'

Continuation of copy: 'However, Aaron is concerned that because aquifers do not correspond to county lines, “over-the-top excessive pumping” in Williamson County eventually will affect Bell County citizens.

Continuation of copy: “Statewide, the biggest issue is finding balance between property rights through groundwater conservation districts while still affording the landowner or industry that wishes to produce,” Aaron said.' End of copy.

Well it is a problem that must be dealt with immediately before we loose too much of this precious commodity, water, or we will all be doing without. The key I believe is one: recycle the maximum amount of water possible, two: restrict all water usage, and three: reuse water to the maximum extent. Rebuild our aquifers back to sufficient levels, or at least to a maintenance level.

Copy: “If we don’t control that water we’d be sucking up mud in a few years.” Grace said. “People have to keep going deeper and deeper to find water. Because of lack of regulations we’ve allowed people to pump them too low, and it takes a long time to replenish.” End of copy.

This has been the personal opinion of this writer and nothing shall be used, in context or without or changed in any way without first notifying, and receiving explicit approval from this writer.
One of the 4.58 % who voted.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.