Kempner reader offers three-part proposal to end gun violence
To the Editor:
Please purchase a subscription to read our premium content. If you have a subscription, please log in or sign up for an account on our website to continue.
Please log in, or sign up for a new account to continue reading.
Thank you for reading! We hope that you continue to enjoy our free content.
Kempner reader offers three-part proposal to end gun violence
To the Editor:
Now with more than 600 mass shootings in 2022, the call grows louder to do something. The old positions of gun control, more mental health help and laws to keep guns from dangerous people get louder but languish in implementation.
There are three components that have to be recognized to change the trend. The first is to recognize that current shoots are copy cat behaviors in expressing rage.
I would say that almost all the shooters are also suicidal. A significant portion of all suicides have anger as a component, but it is turned inward. The young male who feels enraged and victimized identifies with the story of a perpetrator who goes down in a blaze of glory with his assault rifle.
The second component is the marketing of assault rifles. Like glass packs on my car as a teenager, the position of a powerful gun is an extension of his statement of power. And the gun manufacturers market it that way.
I am a gun owner and licensed to carry, but no one needs an assault rifle. They are not defense weapons unless you are of the Oath Keepers mindset that you will have to take down our corrupt government someday.
We need a buy-back program. NRA will say criminals will get guns anyway. It isn’t criminals doing the mass killing.
The third component is the current discourse of rage, blame and victimization.
I learned a new word: stochastic. It means to say things that incite others to act. The charge on the Capitol is the most recent example but history is full of such actions. Hitler used it masterfully to channel the resentment following WW I and the Depression.
Oliver North did Reagan’s dirty work in the Iran Contra scandal. Newt Gingrich’s Moral Majority political theme demonized the opposition and the attack on Nancy Pelosi’s husband reflects the same scathing rhetoric directed toward her.
Because many political leaders believe resentment wins them votes, this atmosphere of anger and blame will continue. This now is our national theme and drives all the previously mentioned behaviors. It will only end when voters will not support candidates who fuel this negativity.
Warren Townsend
Kempner
(3) comments
I agree 100 % with the the comments. The term assault rifle is a term created by gun controller to make you fear the rifle. If I pick up a bat and beat someone over the head I don't hear about assault bats. If someone doesn't like guns then that's fine by me. That is your right. Probably not responsible enough to own one I suppose. But please don't infringe on my God given right to defend my family and friends. The more people like yourselves keep believing that banning a certain type of weapon will end mass shooting is like saying banning drugs will end drug abuse. Stupid people actually believe this fantasy. We live in reality where we need workable solutions not make believe.
Assault rifles have their lineage traced to WWII. They are military rifles that fire an intermediate cartridge, have a removable magazine and have selective rates of fire, one of which must be automatic. These rifles are legal in the US, but are highly controlled. "Assault weapons" is a fabricated term made up by liberals to frighten the people into giving up their rights. This term has no meaning in firearms lexicon, as they do not exist.
Clearly, you have no idea what you're talking about, as you used the term "assault rifle" numerous times and you clearly don't know what an assault rifle is or who owns them. Further, you have decided that you have the right to stomp on my rights by deciding what type of firearms I can own. You have also linked the rights protected by the Constitution with what you think I "need". That's not how any of this works. You also mention a "buy back" program, which is gun control speak for illegal confiscation of firearms. Maybe YOU will fund this illegal program from YOUR bank account? Frankly, you're a gun control troll with no real answers that meet Constitutional muster. I suggest you take a class or two and study history and our Constitution before commenting further.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.